Max Home | CENPET Home | GP Home | CSM Home

 

Physical Reservoir Models: From Pictures to Properties

Prof. Ir. M. (Max) Peeters

Baker Hughes Distinguished Chair of Petrophysics and Borehole Geophysics

 [ Click here to open as an Adobe PDF File ]

Abstract | Introduction | Future Developments | Conclusions | Acknowledgements | References


 

ABSTRACT

Petrophysics and Geophysics have not always worked in the past as closely together as one might expect. This paper discusses current advances, and sketches future developments. The major objective of Geophysical Research was to obtain sharper pictures. With the advent of 3-D seismic, there is a strong trend to make displays both in time and depth, and to convert seismic attributes into rock properties. Conversions based on seismic data alone give non-unique results. Further progress hinges on calibration of acoustic attributes with parameters measured on cores. For time lapse seismic, the situation is even more complicated, due changing effects of temperature, pressure, and compaction. All these effects have to be properly quantified if we want to couple 4-D seismic interpretations to dynamic reservoir models and realize the situation where all geoscientists work on one "unified" 3-D earth model. Biot - Gassman fluid substitution algorithms were successfully applied for decades, but suffer like all mixing laws from non-uniqueness. Recent investigations demonstrate that dispersion in the low frequency band could have strong implications on seismic attribute analysis. Further experimental work is warranted to find out which relations measured at high frequencies can be used for seismic, and which require additional laboratory work. The shock-tube is well suited for this task, because it handles large rock samples, and obtains acoustic responses down to a few hundred Hz.

KEYWORDS : Formation evaluation, reservoir characterization, rock properties

| Top |


INTRODUCTION

Petrophysics and Geophysics have in the past not worked as closely together as one might expect. Both disciplines measure subsurface rock properties, albeit one near the borehole, and the other far away from the surface. While Petrophysics is, or more correctly was restricted to the vicinity of the borehole, Geophysics covered the entire subsurface. Petrophysics looks near the borehole with high resolution, and Geophysics far from the surface with a low resolution. Why was there not more interaction? There are several reasons:

  • Geophysics concentrated on the big picture, and imaging became sometimes a goal in itself. Many papers prove the superiority of a new method with an improvement of the seismic picture. Whether this was the best representation of the physical reality often received less attention.
  • Petrophysics, as the name implies, aimed from its inception at obtaining the physical properties, which are related to vital production parameters such as porosity, saturation and permeability. Petrophysics often evaluated one well at the time, compensating for complicated borehole and invasion effects, but in this process sometimes forgetting the big picture.
  • The scales on which the two disciplines are working are very different. Logs and cores give a resolution better than a foot, while seismic resolution is less than 50 feet at the depth where many hydrocarbon accumulations are found. This is illustrated by projecting a wireline log (white), and half a cycle of a seismic wave (black), on a sequence of sand and shale layers (Figure 1).

Fig.1 Comparison resolution core / logs / seismic
(P. Enbers, 1997)

Figure 1

FORCES THAT FORGE THE FUSION

There has been a dramatic improvement in definition and quality of seismic sections, due to the 3-D seismic revolution. Enhanced images give better stratigraphy and reservoir architecture, but is it enough? To tie the "former" exploration and production communities together one needs to position geological features in time and in depth. This is self evident, but the implication is that more accurate relations between seismic attributes and rock properties are required. We have to put flesh on the bones i.e. display rock properties together with seismic horizons. In a paper fittingly titled: "Seismic lithology - the integration of Seismology and Petrophysics" White (1995) stated, "Just as seismic stratigraphy united seismic interpretation and sedimentary geology, so too will seismic lithology inevitably entail integration of seismology and petrophysics. The results rely on petrophysical modeling and collaboration between seismologists and petrophysicist is needed to understand a seismic response of a large volume of rock." Some impressive innovations have been made over the last decade to satisfy this need.

WIRELINE LOGGING TOOLS

  • Logging tools which can accurately measure both compressional and shear wave velocities (Tang, 1998)
  • Measuring while drilling (MWD) instruments that record compressional wave velocity became recently available (Heysse et al, 1996) and measuring shear wave velocities is probably a matter of time.

Single well seismic tools that measure reflections some 10 m away from the borehole, with transmitters and receivers in one tool, are being proto-typed. (Chang et al 1998)

SEISMIC ACQUISITION

  • Ocean bottom cables (OBC) which make direct contact with the sea-bottom, and measure compressional and shear waves are gaining ground (Soubaras, 1996).
  • Compressional to shear converted waves can be recorded with the OBC and three component (3C) geophones on land. Recent examples of looking through shallow gas zones and beside saltdomes have opened up prospective zones. (Ge et al, 1997).
  • Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) using nine components (Davis, 1998) are now used to detect the position and direction of fracture zones.
  • Time lapse 3-D seismic surveys (4-D) prove that the difference of attributes recorded in time can be related to changes in saturation caused by production (Popov, 1998).

COMPUTING POWER

The tempestuous computer hardware and software development is not only essential for processing the ever increasing amount of data, but also for the design of new logging by means of modeling (Strack et al, 1998). If the doubling of computer power every 2 years continues, we soon will see:

  • 3D pre-stack depth migration within reach of every operator.
  • 3D elastic wave imaging, and inversion.
  • Forward modeling of the tool response while logging is already applied to Stoneley wave permeability prediction (Tang, 1998).

The resolution of the static and dynamic reservoir models is currently an order of magnitude different, with the dynamic model limited to about a million grid blocks. The trend sketched above will shortly enable simulations with several million-grid blocks, approaching the resolution of seismic data, as predicted by Gutteridge (1994).

All these developments bring Petrophysics and Geophysics closer together. The benefits of this trinity of new wireline logging tools, acquisition techniques, and computer power, can only be translated in high resolution 3-D earth models, if they are matched by more accurate relations between rock properties and acoustic parameters. This is probably the most important driving force for the integration of Petrophysics and Geophysics.

INTEGRATION

For a static reservoir model, it is difficult enough to relate porosity, pore-fill, and lithology to seismic attributes. For a dynamic reservoir model, the situation is exacerbated because other parameters such as temperature, pressure, fluid saturation compaction, and changes in pore fluid play a role. This is not an unambiguous exercise as mentioned by (White, 1992): "A major aim of seismic interpretation is inference of petrophysical properties of reservoir rocks. Because [this] inversion is far from unique, this task requires a range of seismic parameters".


One cannot hope to derive all rock properties simultaneously from seismic. After all only one physical phenomenon is measured with a low resolution. There are usually very many configurations, made up of layers with different porosities, acoustic travel times, lithologies, and fluid contacts, that all will produce the same seismic response. Seismic models have to be constrained by other data to limit the number of physical realizations. A recent reservoir characterization study by Workman et al (1997) drew the conclusion :" If no constraints are used, the results of the characterization will be highly non-unique..."

Eventually one wants to be able to superimpose all relevant rock properties onto the seismic horizons, and in addition, it is desirable to follow these parameters as a function of time. If the trend in computer power continues, a 3-D earth model with geological, petrophysical, and geophysical data in all grid-blocks will be available soon. This "unified model" would have the resolution of cores near the well bore; of logs in most other places; and will be used for both static and dynamic modeling.

LOG DERIVED SYNTHETIC SEISMIC

A high-resolution acoustic impedance trace in depth is obtained by simply taking the ratio of density and sonic travel time log readings. However the process of drilling and associated mud invasion has a varied and sometimes a devastating effect on log measurements (Peeters, 1999-1). Corrections for mud invasion and shale alteration are required. For the density tool, a simple linear relation exists between bulk density and the contribution of the rock and fluid volume fractions. Based on firm physical principles, and assuming that mud filtrate and formation water have the same density rw, the correction of the density log for mud filtrate invasion can be expressed as:

In which f is the porosity. Saturations Sw and Sxo of the virgin and the invaded zone respectively are derived from the resistivity logs. Hydrocarbon density rh is based on production samples, and the water density rw from the salinities of mud filtrate and formation water. For sonic logs, corrections are non-linear and more complicated.

BIOT AND BEYOND

The work by Biot (1956) and Gassman (1951) still forms the fundament for quantifying the effects of rock and fluid parameters on acoustic velocities.

The low frequency limit of the fast compressional velocity Vpf in saturated porous rocks is:

(2)


In which rb is the bulk density, H = Kb* + 4 G/3 ; G is the shear modulus, and Kb* is the effective bulk modulus of the saturated rock. Kb* can be predicted with Gassman's (1951) algorithm.

(3)

The subscripts indicate : "f" for fluid, "s" for saturated, "d" for dry, and "m" for minerals / matrix. The non-linear effect of the gas saturation on the fast compressional velocity Vpf is contrasted with density r, and the shear wave velocity Vs in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Fluid saturation effect on density, shear & compressional velocities, and the ratio of the latter.

Fluid Saturation Graph

It is often not realized that the derivation of the Kb* is not unambiguous, but suffers, like other mixing laws, from non-uniqueness. The ratio of the bulk moduli of the dry porous rock over the matrix material Kd/Km is used to approximate the ratio of the load bearing over the total grain area, and is highly compaction dependent (Spencer, 1994). The combination of Gassman's theory (Xu & White, 1995) with the difference of aspect ratio's of shales and sandstone (Toksöz et al, 1976), led to a much better match between modeled and measured acoustic logs. However, the better match transferred the problem from unknown mixing parameters to unknown aspect ratio's (Xu & White, 1995).

That Gassman substitution equations are not universally valid should not come as a surprise. Petrophysics has been plagued with a mixing law problem in shaly sand evaluations for decades. This problem has not been fully solved, despite eminent contributions form Waxman & Smits (1967), Clavier et al (1972), and Worthington (1991).

At high frequencies, fluid flow effects at the grain scale are expected to create velocity dispersion and attenuation. Plona and Johnson (1982) demonstrated that significant frequency effects occur at low frequencies, especially for high porosity rocks. Kelder & Smeulders (1997, 1998) reported experiments over a frequency range from 10 Hz up to 1 MHz on small samples to quantify the effect of grainsize, permeability, and lithology. They measured for the first time the slow wave on natural fluid saturated sandstone.

The fast & slow compressional waves and the shear wave are modes that satisfy the dynamic Biot equation. For the fast compressional wave the fluid in the pores and the matrix material move in phase, while for the slow compressional wave the fluid and matrix movements are out of phase. This latter wave is very dispersive and strongly damped. The velocity of the slow p-wave Vps is, in contrast with the fast p-wave Vpf, not only dependent on the moduli of the matrix materials and pore fluids, but also on the absolute permeability ko

If we assume that the bulk modulus of the matrix material Ks is much larger than that of the fluid Kf and that the compressibility of the grains is very small, we can derive a relation between the ratio of the squares of the compressional waves and the permeability :


(4)

In which f(w) is a complex function of the angular frequency w, rb the bulk density, G the shear modulus, and h the fluid viscosity. If rock and fluid moduli, and the viscosity are known, the slow p-wave velocity can be used to predict permeability (Peeters, 1999-2). Research on rock (Batzle 1992, 1996), and fluid properties (Alberty 1992) is invaluable for determining these parameters. However, the understanding of the effects of partial saturations, lithology, texture, overburden pressure, and especially frequency is far from complete. The need for extending this work will be demonstrated in this rest of this paper.


AMPLITUDE VERSUS OFF-SET (AVO)

The reflection of a plane acoustic wave, which arrives at the interface of two layers under an incident angle q, has been studied for a long time Zoeppritz (1919). The reflection is determined by six elastic rock parameters. These six are compressional velocities Vp1 and Vp2 (average Vpa); shear velocities Vs1 and Vs2 (average Vsa); the densities r1 and r2 ; and Poisson ratio's s1 and s2 (average sa) of the two layers. The normal incidence reflectivity NI (q = 0) is :

(5)


The reflection coefficient RC as a function of reflection angle q can be simplified by using Shuey's approximation (1985), the formalism of Verm & Hilterman (1995), and by dropping terms for q smaller than 30° (tanq = sinq). Finally by assuming that Vpa/Vsa= 2 we find :

RC(q) @ NI + PR sin^2 (q) (6)

PR is the far-offset reflectivity, and is not really a reflectivity and dominated by s. It is therefore convenient to refer to it as the Poisson reflectivity.

(7)



NI depends on both fluid fill and lithology. A large negative change in NI produces a bright spot, and is often related to the presence of a gas sand below a hard shale. A cross-plot of NI vs. PR is a much better vehicle to separate pore fill and lithology effects than reflectivity NI alone. (Engbers, 1997, Figure 3). This figure shows the predominant effect of fluid type on the normal reflection coefficient, and the large lithology effect on the Poisson reflectivity PR. However, a baseline (red line in shaded area) which represents a brine-filled reservoir is required to quantify the hydrocarbon effect.

Figure 3. Normal incidence (NI) vs. Poisson (PR) reflection coefficients (P. Engbers, 1997)

For petrophysicists, the use of cross-plots is standard, and it is pleasing to see that Geophysicists start to exploit this technique. By color coding seismic sections, proportional to the length of the "fluid" arrow shown in Figure 3, it is now possible to differentiate fluid fill, and lithology effects (Verm & Hilterman, 1995). This work is an important step towards the aim of showing rock properties together with the seismic horizons. For fluid and lithology discrimination the assumption Vpa/Vsa equals 2 is often permissible. The danger of using a fixed Vpa/Vsa ratio was recently discussed by Hornby & Pasternack (1998).

They demonstrated that silts with residual gas, which have a much smaller Vpa/Vsa ratio, could be erroneously interpreted as gas bearing sands. This highlights once more that more accurate shear and compressional velocities as a function of partial saturation, fluid type, and lithology are required. Modern dipole tools can provide the Vpa/Vsa ratio with a high spatial resolution. The great potential of dipole sonic tools is illustrated by measurements of Vpa/Vsa through casing, which could even be related to oil saturations (Moos 1995).

CONVERTED WAVE INTERPRETATION

For converted waves, from compressional to shear, the asymmetry of the ray-path is a fundamental problem. There is no common measuring point, even for flat reflectors. The ratio of the tangents of the angel of incidence and the reflection angle are of course proportional to the Vpa/Vsa velocity ratio. The lack of a CMP is usually circumvented by assuming a fixed velocity ratio. However strong vertical variations as found around saltdomes, and gas chimneys, invalidate this assumption. An acceptable solution is obtained via prestack depth migration, but this process can be greatly enhanced if the Vpa/Vsa velocity ratio as a function of depth is available from dipole sonic logs. It is surprising that papers that discuss converted waves seldom mention dipole sonic logs for calibration. The potential of using converted waves is very high (Simmons, 1994), because they are expected to provide better lithology and fluid discrimination than AVO. The discrimination power of the combination of shear and compressional waves is illustrated in Figure 5. This emphasizes the importance of 3 component surveys, which record both the compressional (p) and shear wave (s) velocities, when gas is present. Gas hampers detection of p-waves and can produce featureless p-sections (Peeters et al, 1998). The converted wave technique can be used to image through shallow gas wipeouts. Shear waves get through relatively unscathed. This effect and the twofold increase in resolution due too the use of shear waves is shown in Fig 6.

FUTURE WORK

To reap the full benefits of the techniques discussed above, and get high resolution seismic sections that show rock and fluid properties, it will be mandatory to calibrate the real seismic traces with synthetic traces. These traces should be generated through forward modeling from accurate rock properties, which need to be measured at frequencies close to the seismic frequency band. The large gain in resolution that can be achieved especially with shear wave synthetics is demonstrated in Figure 9 at the end of the paper.

A lot of excellent work has been carried out by Plona (1982), Xu & White (1994), King (1998), but this work was restricted to high frequencies (100 kHz - 1 MHz) and small samples. Limited research has been carried out at much lower frequencies due to the huge difference between a 50 Hz seismic wavelength (~40 m) and a 10 kHz sonic wireline tool wavelength (~20 cm). Dispersion can play an important role even for low frequencies (Kelder & Smeulders 1997). Batzle et al (1996) demonstrated that partially saturated rocks can have a high dispersion and attenuation in the 0 to 1 kHz range (Fig. 4).

Supplementary experiments are required to find out which high frequency results can be extrapolated to the seismic domain. Resonant bar experiments on rod shaped rock samples can go down to 1 kHz, but do not cover all wave modes. (Sothcott et al 1998).


Figure 4: Dispersion of compresional velocity as a function of partial saturation (Batzle 1996)

Figure 5 : Combination of shear (r.Vs) , and
compressional (r.Vp) impedances

Figure 6 : Comparison P & S CMP panels Huesca
Peeters (1999-1)

 

In a shock-tube, (Figure 7), it is possible to measure the progress of a pressure step-function through a sample. (Wisse 1998). The shock tube can accommodate samples of more than 1 m in length, which opens up the possibility to record signals with frequencies down to 1 kHz, thus approaching the seismic frequency range. Large samples allow accurate attenuation measurements, which is important for Q-factor verification. The high power of the pressure step-function makes it relatively easy to detect the slow p-wave. Modeling a borehole configuration indicated that the slow p-wave arrivals could be detected for formations with permeabilities down to 10 mD. In contrast with methods based on Stoneley wave logging (Cheng & Tang 1995, Tang et al 1998) or flow analysis during formation testing, the slow-p wave technique is in theory insensitive to borehole effects.

Figure 7: Shock-tube experimental set up

| Top |


FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Inversion by comparing the actual measurements (logs, seismic) with forward modeling results, will rapidly gain in importance as computer power constraints are diminishing. The distinction between inversion of an induction log, a wave train from a sonic tool, or a single seismic trace, will vanish and be performed by similar software. This trend is expected to blur boundaries between Petrophysics and Geophysics.

The requirement to approach the physical reality more closely can only be fulfilled if accurate rock and fluid properties have been measured on samples. The limitations of the Gassman fluid substitution algorithms, the lack of proper shear velocities in unconsolidated sediments, and the uncertainty of the dispersion effect on acoustic velocities,
all strengthen the need for more fundamental work in this area Forward modeling and simultaneous inversion of all log data to find rock properties is currently being investigated. The time might be near when log data and seismic traces are inverted together to update the 3-D earth model, without carrying out separate wireline log and seismic interpretations.

More efforts need also to be spent on increasing the seismic bandwidth towards higher frequencies both through advanced acquisition and processing techniques. Downhole sources and "permanent" geophone strings in observation wells are instrumental to achieve this goal. Only if both more accurate rock properties and wide band seismic are available can we expect significant improvements in reservoir characterization.

Figure 8: Comparison of shear wave synthetics derived from dipole sonic and density logs with surface shear seismic (Blaylock, May 1999)

| Top |


CONCLUSIONS


1. Geophysics and Petrophysics are drawing together, because they progressively use common techniques such as forward modeling and cross-plotting, to determine rock properties.
2. The blurring of disciplinary boundaries is not restricted to Petrophysics and Geophysics. If the steep trend in computer power continues, the distinction between static and dynamic reservoir models will vanish. All geo-scientists will then work on "unified" 3-D earth models.
3. More accurate relations between seismic attributes and rock properties, underpinned by theoretical work, are required to realize the full potential of pre-stack depth migration, and amplitude vs. offset studies.

4. Gassman's fluid substitution algorithm compensates acoustic velocities for changes in pore fluids. Recent research indicates frequency dependence not only for high frequencies but also in the seismic frequency band, which warrants further experimental research
5. The shock-tube experimental set-up is well suited for this work, because it handles large rock samples, and obtains responses down to 1 kHz.

| Top |



ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


This paper is an extract of the address by the author, presented on the commencement of the Baker Hughes Distinguished Chair. The support C. Payton, K. Strack, and D. Skerl of the former Atlas Wireline Logging company, is gratefully acknowledged

| Top |



REFERENCES

Alberty, M.
The effect of salinity, gas-oil ratio's, pressure, temperature, on acoustic travel times. The Log Analyst, 1992.

Blaylock, J.J.
Interpretation of a baseline 4-D multi-component seismic survey at Vacuum field Lea County New Mexico. PhD thesis Colorado School of Mines, dept. Geophysics, May 1999.

Batzle, M. and Wang, Z.
Seismic properties of pore fluids.
Geophysics, 57(11) p 1396, 1992.

Batzle, M.De-hua Han, Castangna, J.
Seismic freqency measurements of velocity and attenuation SEG 66th Annual meeting, 1996.

Biot, M.A.
Theory of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid, II Higher frequency range.Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 28 : p179, 1956.

Chang, C., Hoyle, D., Wanatabe, S., Coates, R., Kane, M., Dodds, K., Esmersoy, C., Foreman, J. Localized maps of the Subsurface. Oilfield Review, Spring 1998.

Cheng, C.H. , Tang, VX.
Borehole Stoneley wave propagation across permeable structures
Geophysics Pros. 193, 41, 165-187, 1995.

Clavier, C., Coates, G., Dumanoir, J.
Theoretical and experimental basis for the "dual water" model; for the interpretation of shaly sands. SPE Journal, v. 24, 1984.

Davis, T.L. et al
4D, 3C Seismology and dynamic reservoir characterization. A geophysical renaissance.
EAGE, 60th Conference and Technical Exhibition, paper 3-38, June 1998.

Engbers, P.
Overview of lateral prediction,
Private communication, 1998

Gassman, F.
Uber die elastizität poroser medien, Viertel-jahrsschrift Naturforschung Ges. Zürich, 96, 1951.

Ge, H., Jackson, M.P.A. and Vendeville, B.C.
Extensional origin of breached Paradox Diapirs, Utah and Colorado: Field Observations and Scaled Physical models. Geological Association Guidebook 25 pp. 285-293. 1996.

 

Gutteridge, P. et al
Closing the loop Seismic modelling from reservoir simulation results. EAPG, 6th Conference and Technical Exhibition, paper CO16, June 1994.

Heysse, D.L., Robbins, C., Minear, J.
Field tests of an acoustic logging while drilling tool in various borehole environments. SPWLA 37th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, June 1996.

Huang, X.R., Meister, L., Workman, R.
Reservoir characterization by integrating of time-lapse seismic and production data. SPE 38695, October 1997.

Hornby, B.E., Pasternack, E.S.
Analysis of full waveform sonic data acquired in unconsolidated gas sands. SPWLA 39th Annual Logging Symposium, paper O, May 1998.

Kelder, O., Smeulders, D.M.J.
Measurement of ultrasonic bulk properties of water saturated porous media. EAGE, 58 th annual meeting, paper CO25, Amsterdam, 1996.

Kelder, O., Smeulders, D.M.J. Observation of the Biot slow compressional wave in water-saturated Nivelsteiner sandstone. Geophysics, 62, p 1794, 1997.

Kelder, O.
Frequency-dependent wave propagation in water-saturated porous media PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, February 1998.

Moos, D. et al
Field test of Acoustic logs for the measuring of porosity and oil saturation in a mature waterflood field., SPE 29655, 1995.

Peeters, M., G. G. Drijkoningen, M. E. Donselaar, M. H. van Kempen. Huesca "High resolution subsurface imaging and rock characterization" SEG, 68th Annual Conference, September 1998.

Peeters, M.
Method for measuring reservoir permeability using slow compressional waves. Patent Application no 09/252,419 attorney file no. 18683-01890, February 1999

Peeters, M., Allen D., Gomes R.,
Invasion in Space and Time. SPWLA 40 th, Annual Logging Symposium, Oslo, May 1999.
Plona, T.J., Johnson, D.L.
Acoustic slow waves and the consolidation transition
J. Acoustic Soc. Am. Vol 72, 556, 1982.

Popov, S.
Two emerging technologies enhance reservoir management Hart's Petroleum Engineer Int. 1998.
Shuey, R.T.
A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations
Geophysics, 50, p 609, 1985.

Simmons, J.L. Jr. and Backus, M.M.
AVO modeling and the locally converted shear wave, Geophysics, 59(9), pp. 1237, August 1994.

Sothcott, J., et al.
Low frequency acoustic measurements in the laboratory. EAGE, 60th Conference and Technical Exhibition, paper 10-29, June 1998.

Soubaras, R.
Calibration and deghosting Ocean bottom hydrophone and geophone measurements EAGE, 28th Annual Conference, paper BO19, 1996.

Spencer, J.W. et al.
Frame moduli of unconsolidated sands and sandstones. Geophysics, 59 , p1352, 1994.

Strack, K.M., Aronstam, P., Georgi, D.
Formation Evaluation challenges in 21 st century wells SPWLA seminar, Aberdeen, May 1998.

Tang X.M., Altunbay, M., Shorey, D.
Joint interpretation of formation permeability from acoustic, NMR, and image log data.
SPWLA 39th, Annual Symposium, May 1998.

Verm, R. & Hilterman, F.
Lithology coded seismic sections :
The calibration of AVO cross-plotting to rock properties. The Leading Edge, p:847, August 1995.

Waxman, M.H. & Smits, L.J.M.
Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands. SPE 1863-A, 42 nd Annual fall meeting, 1967.

White, R.E.
Seismic lithology : the interpretation of seismology and Petrophysics. The Dialog, October 1995.

White R.E.
The accuracy of estimating Q from seismic data. Geophysics vol. 57 no. 11, p.1508-1511, 1992.

Whorthington, P.F.
Characterization of water saturation algorithms trough dual salinity desaturations.
The Log Analyst, p 31, Jan-Febr. 1996.
Wisse, C.J. Smeulders, D.M.J., Dongen, M.E.H. van
Shock tube measurments on water-saturated porous cylinders. Paper submitted for the Biot Conference, Leuven, September 1998.

Zoeppritz, K.
Über Erdbebenwellen, VIIB,
Über Reflextion unde Durchgang seismischer Wellen durch Unstetigkeitsflächen.
Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse : 57-84, 1919.




| Top |


 

 Max Home | CENPET Home | GP Home | CSM Home

 


 Center for Petrophysics

 Department of Geophysics

Colorado School of Mines

 Golden, CO 80401
 

 TEL: (303) 273-3940

 FAX: (303) 273-3478