This Week's Lecture | Current Lecture Schedule | Fall 2001 Abstracts | Spring 2001 Abstracts | Fall 2000 Abstracts
SPRING 2001 HEILAND LECTURE SERIES
Abstracts
Gwenola Michaud
Ph.D. Degree Candidate
Friday, March 30, 2001 • Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
4D Borehole Seismic Study, Vacuum Field, New Mexico
Vacuum Field, New Mexico is currently in tertiary oil recovery with a CO2 injection plan performed at the San Andres reservoir. Understanding direction of open fractures, degree of fracturing, changes of pore pressure and fluid substitution is required to monitor fluid flow within reservoirs. Time-lapse multicomponent borehole seismic data were recorded to help in carbonate reservoir characterization and calibrate changes in seismic properties associated with CO2 flooding. These borehole seismic data were recorded 500 ft away from two CO2 injectors and comprise a near-offset vertical seismic profile (VSP), a walkaway recorded beneath the reservoir and a 3D VSP, acquired simultaneously with the surface seismic data.

Analysis of velocities, shear wave polarizations and Q factor from VSP data have allowed a better understanding of the near-surface and reservoir at the vicinity of the VSP well. The study on shear wave anisotropy from estimation of shear wave polarization and time delay has enabled the detection of a weak anisotropic zone from the surface down to 1000 ft with a polarization of fast shear waves of N120E. No changes of shear wave polarization angle and time delays have been detected, inferring no variations in the fracture direction, density and local maximum stress over time. However, time-lapse changes in attenuation on each dataset (VSP, 3D VSP and walkaway) are observed at the reservoir after CO2 flooding t he interpretation of the time-lapse borehole seismic data suggests that CO2 has contacted the VSP well along a fracture zone over a time of eight months. Indeed, the structural interpretation enables us to confirm the presence of faults and fracture zones that explain the locations of changes in the fluid properties and CO2 flooding observed from the surface seismic data during the RCP Phases VI and VII.

Gwenola Michaud earned a M.S. in Geophysics at Strasbourg, in 1997 and a B.S. in Mathematics and Computer Sciences at Pau, in 1994. Before beginning her Ph.D. program at Mines, she worked at the Compagnie Generale de Geophysique (CGG) at Massy. Her studies at the CSM were sponsored by CGG.

Return to Top
Luca Duranti
Ph.D Degree Canidate
Friday, March 30, 2001 • Metals Hall • Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Time Lapse Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring of a Carbon Dioxide
Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection is currently used as a tertiary recovery method in the Permian San Andres Formation, Central Vacuum Unit, Lea County, New Mexico. Multicomponent, 3D seismic surveys were conducted prior to and 8 months after carbon dioxide injection in an attempt to monitor the fluid front. Poststack layer stripping and cross-equalization techniques were applied to the time-lapse data volumes to enhance the interpretability of the compressional and shear modes, and their variation over time. Time-lapse images reveal a complex seismic sensitivity to pressure and fluid changes over time. Seismic observations are explained on the basis of a specific rock model involving interaction between the porous and fractured dolomite reservoir rock, and the physical properties of the reservoir fluids.

Luca Duranti has a B.Sc. in Geology from the University of Florence, Italy (1990). He worked for Schlumberger from 1991 to 1996, enjoying the international assignments and the diversity of projects he was involved with. In September 1996 he started graduate work with the Reservoir Characterization Project at the Colorado School of Mines.

Return to Top
Dr. David Lumley
President & CEO of 4th Wave Imaging Corp.
Laguna Beach, CA
SEG/AAPG Fall 2000 Distinguished Lecturer
Friday, March 23, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
The Next Wave in Reservoir Monitoring: The Instrumented Oil Field
Several technologies are advancing to better monitor and optimize reservoir production. These include time-lapse surface and borehole seismic, shear wave technology, directional drilling, permanent sensor installations, intelligent well completions, fiber optics, remote control operations, data management and internet technology, shared earth models to extract and archive reservoir knowledge, data visualization, parallel computing, and rapid modeling, processing, analysis and decision-making tools. These diverse technologies are converging toward the target of real-time monitoring and optimization of reservoir production: the instrumented oilfield.

In the geophysical world, time-lapse seismic technology has been rapidly advancing over the past few years. Several industry case studies are presented that show 4D seismic is able to monitor injected fluid fronts, locate bypassed oil, map pressure compartmentalization, and delineate the sealing or leaking flow properties of faults. High-resolution time-lapse seismic monitoring has been performed in the borehole, in VSP and crosswell geometries. Together, time-lapse surface and borehole seismic techniques have the possibility to cover multiple reservoir scales in terms of both spatial and time-lapse resolution. Permanent installation of receiver arrays, originally motivated by increased repeatability and signal-to-noise energy, have the potential to offer useful benefits in data acquisition cost reduction and real-time surveying flexibility. Since multi-component receivers can be installed for nearly the same price as acoustic sensors, the additional information from shear waves can be useful for monitoring pressure fronts, in situ stress, and real-time fracturing. However, many hardware, software, deployment and logistical issues remain to be solved before permanent seismic arrays become a practical reality.

David E. Lumley is co-founder of 4th Wave Imaging Corp., a seismic imaging R&D company offering expert solutions and services in 4D time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring and multi-component seismic data analysis. His previous work experience includes a position as a Senior Staff Research Scientist with Chevron Petroleum Technology, and research and operations assignments with Arco Research, Mobil R&D Corp., and Mobil Canada. Prior to that, David worked as a seismic crew leader for Western Geophysical on marine seismic vessels in the Gulf of Mexico and the North Atlantic. David received a B.Sc. and M.Sc. from the University of British Columbia, and a Ph.D. from Stanford University where he now visits as a Consulting Professor. David currently serves on the SEG Research Committee, is Chair of the 2001 SEG Summer Research Workshop, and is a member of the AGU, SIAM, SEG and SPE. David has received several awards for his papers and presentations, and is a recipient of the 1996 SEG Karcher Award for research scientists.

Return to Top
Mauricio D. Sacchi
Department of Physics University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Friday, March 9, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
AR, MA, and ARMA Modeling With Applications to Seismic Signal Processing
In this presentation, I will provide an overview of time series modeling methods with applications to seismic signal processing. Specifically, I will examine three important time series models: AR (auto-regressive), MA (moving average) and ARMA models. In the first part of my talk, I will focus the discussion on AR and MA models. These models are central to the problem of deconvolution and spectral factorization (minimum phase wavelet estimation). I will show that, by adopting a higher order statistics approach, non-minimum phase wavelets can be estimated via a procedure that resembles the well-known Kolmogoroff spectral factorization technique. In this case, instead of factorizing a phase-less function (power spectrum), we factorize a trispectum (spectrum of the 4th order cumulant of the data).

In the second part of my talk, I will examine AR and ARMA models in the context of f-x random noise attenuation. I will show that an ARMA model provides the proper representation for a superposition of plane waves immersed in white noise. Finally, I will discuss the relation that exists between the ARMA representation, the Pisarenko harmonic estimator and the projection filtering techniqueproposed by Soubaras (SEG 1994, 1995).

Mauricio D. Sacchi was born in Colonel Brandsen, Argentina. He received his Diploma in Geophysics from the Department of Astronomy and Geophysics, National University of La Plata, Argentina, in 1988 and a Ph.D. in geophysics from the University of British Columbia, Canada, in 1996. He joined the Department of Physics at the University of Alberta in 1997 as an assistant professor of Geophysics. His research interests are in seismic data processing, imaging, time series analysis and inverse theory.

Return to Top
Kristen Lewis
Colorado School of Mines
Friday, March 2, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Multiple Impact Phase Mismatching in Shallow Seismic Data
To complete shallow seismic surveys, different types of sources are often employed. These include impact and weight-drop devices, modified rifles and guns, small explosives and, more recently, spark plugs. Because of their low cost, noninvasive nature, portability, and ease of use, sledgehammer-impact sources are often selected as the source of choice. These sledgehammer-impact sources typically involve striking a metal plate or block with a sledgehammer to produce the desired compressional and/or shear waves. Unfortunately, several complications often arise when using sledgehammer-impact sources for example: they efficiently generate ground roll and air waves. Another complication that often occurs when using these sources is called multiple-impact phase mismatching. When examining data acquired from a series of single impacts located at the same source location, one would expect the arrivals on the seismic traces to be in-phase. Often, this is not the case. In many instances, a time-variable phase shift is observed between the arrivals on the seismic records. This phenomenon is called multiple-impact phase mismatching. If common processing procedures are followed, multiple-impact phase mismatching can be of concern, especially for near-surface data. In general, most sledgehammer-impact seismic data are acquired using in-the-field vertical stacking procedures, where traces from several impacts are summed together before being written to disk. For traces exhibiting multiple-impact phase mismatching, the use of vertical stacking results in a loss of signal, due to the destructive interference of the phase-shifted events. This loss of signal is especially troublesome for near-surface data, where the signal-to-noise ratio is already low.

Although few studies have attempted to quantify, model, or adequately explain the source mechanism(s) that produce(s) the multiple-impact phase mismatches, preliminary studies indicate that the mismatches may result from deformation that occurs near the sledgehammer-impact source. Since the seismic moment tensor depends on the strength and orientation of the source and contains all the information about the source character, any changes in these parameters that occur as a function of impact number should also be reflected as changes in the moment tensor. Through the use of moment tensor inversion, I intend to examine how the source characteristics change as a function of the number of sledgehammer impacts, which will help determine if the phase mismatches are, in fact, caused by near-source deformation. I am currently a doctoral student in the Near-Surface Seismology Group.

I received a BA degree in physics from Ohio Wesleyan University in 1996. Upon completion of my Ph.D., I will be joining BP Amoco at their Houston office.
Return to Top
Roberto Aguilera
Servipetrol Ltd., Calgary, Canada
Friday, February 23, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

This presentation will focus on practical aspects of naturally fractured reservoirs. Key points will be illustrated with data from reservoirs in Argentina, Colombia, USA, Canada and Australia. The first example highlights how a drastic gas production decline due to water encroachment in a field producing from a naturally fractured reservoir was stopped by producing more water from flank wells that had already watered-out completely. The second case shows the importance of long periods of swabbing. A key to proper evaluation of a fractured formation is to swab at least the amount of mud lost during drilling operations. Not doing so might lead to the abandonment of a reservoir that otherwise could be commercial. Underbalance drilling helps to solve this problem in many naturally fractured reservoirs. The third case demonstrates how poor assumptions regarding porosity, permeability, and water saturation cut-offs might lead to the improper testing and perforating of a well. The fourth case present's problems associated with not intersecting natural fractures. In these cases, a conventional test might yield negative results, even if the matrix blocks are hydrocarbon saturated. The fifth example highlights poor well testing designs that are typically associated with very short flow and build-up periods. The sixth example discusses poor completions. They are the result of not drilling the wells thinking in terms of natural fractures.

Roberto Aguilera, Ph.D., is president of Servipetrol Ltd. in Calgary, Canada. He has an undergraduate degree in petroleum engineering from the Universidad de America in Bogota, Colombia, and a master's and doctorate in petroleum engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. As a consultant since 1978, he has conducted petroleum-engineering studies and has presented his short course on Naturally Fractured Reservoirs throughout the world.

Dr. Aguilera has developed various techniques for evaluation of naturally fractured reservoirs that have been published in leading journals of the oil industry. He has authored and was a contributor to various books including Naturally Fractured Reservoirs (PennWell, 1980 and 1995).

Return to Top
Luis H. Amaral
Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines
Friday, February 16, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Shear Wave Azimuthal Avo Analysis in Vacuum Field, New Mexico
During its productive life, a typical oil field may have as much as 30% of original oil in place, or 40-50% of its recoverable oil, bypassed either due to reservoir heterogeneity or to producing techniques. To recover this bypassed oil is not only a matter of better economical exploitation of the reservoir, but represents also the access to a most important energy source that would be lost. Reservoir characterization is a multidisciplinary approach to reservoir development that searches for a detailed definition of the reservoir geology and hydrocarbon production and reservoir performance monitoring.

Reservoir Characterization Project Phase VII acquired a time-lapse multicomponent 3D seismic survey in Vacuum Field, New Mexico, for CO2 injection monitoring and permeability, fluid and flow characterization.

Multicomponent AVO analysis is a powerful tool for porosity and permeability estimation. Plane-wave reflection coefficients are inverted for density, fracture density and shear velocity contrasts, using a weighted least squares technique. The interpretation of the AVO attributes estimates porosity and permeability of the reservoir. Some examples from Vacuum Field will be discussed, comparing the estimates obtained with data derived from other sources, like well-log derived porosity, production statistics and CO2 injection results. AVO attributes estimates, along with time-lapse analysis, applied to CO2 injection monitoring and orientation can increase Vacuum Field recovery ratio by 15%.

Luis H. Amaral is an MS candidate in the Department of Geophysics at Colorado School of Mines, working in RCP Phase VII. He earned his BA in geology for Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil, in 1982. He joined Petrobras in 1983, which sponsors him, and worked in seismic data acquisition and processing. He spent 8 years in Amazon; most of them involved in operations in the jungle. When he left Brazil for CSM, he was manager of geophysics for Sergipe-Alagoas basin, in the northeast of Brazil.

Return to Top
Keith Hirsche

Friday, February 9, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Rock Physics and Modeling in the Interpretation of Time Lapse Seismic Data
Time-lapse seismic monitoring involves the comparison of two or more surveys acquired at different times over an active producing field. Spurious differences between the seismic surveys, caused by seismic acquisition and processing as well as seasonal variations in the near surface, must be minimized to isolate and enhance the differences in seismic signal that are caused by the production process. Once these production-related changes are identified, they must be properly interpreted and calibrated before the seismic information can be used to enhance the recovery process.

Time-lapse seismic monitoring involves the comparison of two or more surveys acquired at different times over an active producing field. Spurious differences between the seismic surveys, caused by seismic acquisition and processing as well as seasonal variations in the near surface, must be minimized to isolate and enhance the differences in seismic signal that are caused by the production process. Once these production-related changes are identified, they must be properly interpreted and calibrated before the seismic information can be used to enhance the recovery process.
This calibration procedure was applied to the data from the Amoco/Aostra Gregoire Lake steam flood pilot. Changes in reservoir temperature estimated from the seismic data compare favorably with temperature logs recorded at the observation wells and the interpreted distribution of heated zones in the reservoir is consistent with the production history of the field.

Keith Hirsche started his geophysical career in 1977 as a line crew helper. Since 1982, he has worked in geophysical research and development for GSI, Western and Hampson-Russell Software. During this time, his primary research interests have included VSP, multi-component seismology and the use of seismic data in reservoir characterization and monitoring. Keith is currently employed at Hampson-Russell Software where he is consulting on reservoir-related projects and supervising software development for time-lapse seismic monitoring applications.

Return to Top
Jay Close
Burlington Resources, Inc.
Friday, February 7, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
The Past, Present and Future of Coal Gas: An Early 2001 Perspective
Coal gas, usually termed "coalbed methane" because gases from coals are typically methane-rich, matured from being a hazard to coal miners and a curiosity for petroleum companies prior to the middle 1980's into a standalone source of natural gas reserves and production in the 1990's. In 1999, coal gas accounted for 7.7% and 6.3% of total US natural gas reserves and production respectively (including Alaska). The oil embargo of 1973-74 and ensuing economic hardships served as a key impetus for the US Bureau of Mines and US Department of Energy to begin investigation of alternative domestic energy sources, including coal gas, in the middle 1970's. The Gas Research Institute (now the Gas Technology Institute) also became a key sponsor of coal gas research in the early 1980's. These organizations, along with a large number of oil and gas companies, performed resource assessments of coal basins throughout the United States and wellsite-based cooperative research projects in the Black Warrior Basin, Alabama and the Piceance and San Juan basins of Colorado and New Mexico. Application of several traditional oilfield practices and many newly developed technologies, along with the strong price incentive due to the IRS Section 29-tax credit, led to widespread exploration drilling in coal basins throughout the US in the 1980's and early 1990's. The industry was rewarded with good success in the Black Warrior Basin and extraordinarily positive results in the San Juan Basin. The desire to potentially replicate San Juan Basin success motivated ongoing exploration throughout the US and worldwide after expiration of the tax credit in 1992. These efforts have been richly rewarded and include major discoveries in the Uinta Basin (northeastern Utah), Powder River Basin (northeastern Wyoming) and the Raton Basin, where delineation and development are ongoing. In the international arena, exploration is being actively pursued in Canada, the United Kingdom, and several areas in Europe, Russia and the Ukraine, and China and Australia, amongst others. Coal gas reserves and production will likely continue to increase, especially as conventional reservoirs are progressively depleted. Carbon dioxide injection into coals (sequestration) for enhanced recovery and CO2 disposal is being performed in pilot tests in the western US and western Canada, and due to environmental concerns will quite possibly play a key future role in the ongoing evolution of the coal gas industry.

Jay Close and his dissertation advisor, Russ Dutcher of Southern Illinois University, investigated the coal gas potential of the Raton Basin in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico from 1985 to 1988 with Amoco Production Company. Afterwards, Jay went to work for Resource Enterprises Inc. (REI), a subsidiary of Terra Tek, Salt Lake City, where he was project geologist for the Gas Research Institute's Western Cretaceous Coal Seam Project. The REI team published numerous technical reports and papers on the results of wellsite-based coal gas formation evaluation and completion engineering research, particularly in the Piceance and San Juan basins of Colorado and New Mexico. REI was also retained as a consultant on coal gas and coalmine degasification geology, completion and reserve analysis projects for major and independent operators and mining companies worldwide. Jay has been with Burlington Resources since 1993. He worked on teams responsible for coal gas and tight gas sandstone production optimization and reserve growth in the San Juan Basin until 1998, when he transferred to the International and Corporate offices in Houston. Jay then prepared a study on the commercial potential of coal gas reservoirs throughout the world. He is currently involved with the evaluation of coal gas opportunities in western Canada. His recent assignments have also included sequence stratigraphic mapping in eastern Algeria, and an assessment of exploration and production opportunities in the Middle East.
Return to Top
James F. Greenleaf, Ph.D.
Mayo Clinic, Basic Ultrasound Research Laboratory
Department of Physiology and Biophysics
Friday, February 2, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Ultrasound Stimulated Vibro-acoustograpy

Palpation is routinely used for the evaluation of mechanical properties of tissue in regions that are accessible to touch. This means of detecting pathology using the "stiffness" of the tissue is more than 2000 years old. Even today it is common for surgeons to feel lesions during surgery that have been missed by advanced imaging methods. Palpation is subjective and limited to individual experience and to the accessibility of the tissue region to touch. It appears that a means of noninvasively imaging elastic modulus (the ratio of applied stress to strain) may be useful to distinguish tissues and pathologic processes based on mechanical properties such as elastic modulus. To this end many approaches have been developed over the years. The approaches have been to use conventional imaging methods to measure the mechanical response of tissue to mechanical stress. Static, quasi-static or cyclic stresses have been applied. The resulting strains have been measured using ultrasound or MRI and the related elastic modulus has been computed from viscoelastic models of tissue mechanics. Recently we have developed a new ultrasound technique that produces speckle free images related to both tissue stiffness and reflectivity. This method, termed "Ultrasound Stimulated Vibroacoustography" (Science 280:82-85, April 3, 1998; Proc Natl. Acad. SCI USA 96:6603-6608, June 1999), uses ultrasound radiation pressure to produce sound vibrations from a small region of the tissue that depend on the elastic characteristics of the tissue. The method can detect microcalcification within breasts, and promises to provide high quality images of calcification within the arteries. In addition, vibro-acoustography can detect mechanical defects in certain prostheses such as artificial mitral and aortic valves. The method may also be used in nondestructive evaluation, and for underwater communication.

James F. Greenleaf was born in Salt Lake City, UT, on February 10, 1942. He received the BS degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, in 1964, the MS degree in Engineering Science from Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, in 1968, and the Ph.D. degree in Engineering Science from the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, and Purdue University in 1970. He is currently Professor of Biophysics and Associate Professor of Medicine, Mayo Medical School, and Consultant, Department of Physiology, Biophysics, and Cardiovascular Disease and Medicine, Mayo Foundation. He has served on the IEEE Technical Committee for the Ultrasonics Symposium for five years. He served on the IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Society (UFFC-S) Subcommittee on Ultrasonics in Medicine. Doctor Greenleaf was President of the UFFC-S in 1992 and 1993 and is currently Vice President for Ultrasonics. Doctor Greenleaf has ten patents and is recipient of the 1986 J. Holmes Pioneer Award and the 1998 William J. Fry Memorial Lecture Award from the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and is a Fellow of IEEE, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, and American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering. Doctor Greenleaf was the Distinguished Lecturer for IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Society (1990/1991). His special field of interest is ultrasonic biomedical science, and he has published more than 291 articles and edited or authored five books in the field.

Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top
Terence K. Young and Alexandre A. Gret
Deptartment of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines
Friday, January 12, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Avalanche Forecasting
Snow avalanches kill an average of six people each year in Colorado, more than in any other state. Last season Colorado had eight avalanche-related fatalities. The first fatality for this season occurred during the recent holiday period. Avalanches primarily affect people skiing, snowboarding, or pursuing other recreation in the backcountry, and motorists travelling over Berthoud, Red Mountain, Loveland and other Colorado mountain passes.

Last summer, the Colorado Avalanche Information Center (CAIC) provided financial support to fund undergraduate research in avalanche forecasting. Two students in the Department of Geophysics analyzed weather and avalanche-occurrence data from Berthoud Pass spanning the twenty-four year period from 1970 to 1994 and implemented a nearest-neighbor algorithm to aid avalanche forecasters this season.Three other undergraduates continued the research program during fall semester, extending the nearest neighbor algorithm and doing a preliminary analysis of data from Red Mountain Pass.

This presentation consists of two parts. The first part will include a brief overview of avalanche forecasting and a review of work done at Mines in collaboration with the CAIC. The second part will feature aspects of the Swiss avalanche-forecasting program, which is generally recognized as the most advanced in the world.

Terry Young is Professor and Head of the Department of Geophysics at Colorado School of Mines. Prior to coming to Mines last January, Terry spent eighteen years in the petroleum industry where he managed geophysics research for Mobil Corporation and led an exploration team in the U.K. sector of the North Sea. Terry earned his B.A. from Stanford University, and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Colorado School of Mines.

Alexandre Gret is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Geophysics at Colorado School of Mines. Alex earned his M.S. at ETH Zurich. During his military service, Alex participated in the Swiss avalanche-forecasting effort by making observations in the field and transmitting data back to a central site for processing and analysis.

Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top
Steve Pride,
University of Rennes, France
Friday, January 14, 2001• Metals Hall, Green Center • 4:00 p.m.
Electroseismic Wave Phenomena
When seismic waves propagate through the near surface layers of the earth, they generate electromagnetic fields through an electrokinetic coupling mechanism. The opposite effect by which EM fields generate elastic waves is also possible and may even be the more efficient way to exploit the coupling for exploration purposes. A first goal of this talk is to simply present data collected by the author and his collaborators in France that demonstrate the existence of the seismic to EM conversions. Data from other research groups will also be presented. A second goal is to discuss in some detail the physics of the coupling starting at molecular scales and working up to governing equations that control the coupling at the seismic-wavelength scale. Numerical simulations of the seismic/EM disturbances that are based on such equations will be shown. The overriding objective of the presentation is to lay out both the problems and possibilities of using the electroseismic coupling as an exploration tool.

Steve Pride received his B.A. in geophysics from the University of California at Berkeley (1985) and his Ph.D. from Texas A&M (1991). After a post-doc at the Earth Resources Laboratory at MIT (1991-1993) he accepted a tenured academic post (called ``maitre de conferences'') at the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris where he taught from 1993-1997. Since 1997 he has been a professor of geophysics at the University of Rennes in France where he lives with his wife and two young children. He is currently a visiting professor at Stanford University through to August of 2001. His research interests are in all aspects of rock and crustal physics. Recent projects include such diverse subject areas as two-phase flow in porous media, crack localization during brittle fracture, theory of poroelasticity, electrokinetic phenomena in the crust, and the electrical conductivity of shaly sandstones.

Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top Return to Top